Communicative implicature and the problem of "redundancy" of complex sentence models (based on the Turkish language)

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of communicative implicature and models of complex sentences. The author argues that in connection with the development of linguopragmatics, the act of communication is considered from a different angle. Thus, the concepts of implicature and explication, introduced into linguistics by Herbert Paul Grace, are distinguished by a real meaning, which has acquired a hidden, explicit verbalization. In the first case, if the intensity of the speaker does not find its verbal realization, in the second case, the addressee has the opportunity to express his communicative goal in a clear picture, by appropriate formal semantic means.

It turns out that sometimes the redundancy of complex sentences is possible in accordance with the requirements of the communication code that regulates communication. At the same time, courtesy and apologies are used to provide any information in accordance with the requirements of maximum courtesy. For example, the author's analysis of complex sentence models with the heading “affınıza sığınarak söylüyorum” - “please, accept my excuse" comes to the conclusion that the existing ritual is used directly in accordance with the rules of politeness inherent in Turkish society, while there is no semantic intervention (i.e. participation in the verbalization of the general meaning of the sentence). That is, in many cases, this extra part simply reflects a normal apology and does not reflect any real regret, apology, or shame.

The article analyzes the interference of the maxima of the communicative code in models of complex sentences, which is relevant for linguopragmatics. It is clear that the analysis of patterns of complex sentences in the Turkish language in the functional and communicative aspects requires taking into account the implicative factor and the corresponding analysis and evaluation.